Skip to content
18+

Age check

There’s an age limit on this one, and it’s eighteen. Are you clear of it?

Confirming takes you straight through to a call. Either way, nothing about the answer is kept.

Confirm: I’m 18 or older

Anonymous Video Chat

The useful thing about a site where nobody can look anybody up is that the blank runs both ways. Whoever appears knows as little about you as you know about them, and neither of you can go and fix that by checking. It reads like a limitation. In practice it’s the reason a call here is under way in fifteen seconds or so, while a message to somebody you half-know can sit unsent for ten minutes.

Most writing about staying unidentified online is about cover: what you’re keeping back, and from whom. What follows is plainer than that. On Anonymous Video Chat there’s no account, so there’s no profile, so there’s nothing for either side to read up on beforehand. Neither of you turns up holding more than the other. Call it a level start.

What a first call actually consists of

There are four of them, and none wants anything typed.

  1. The browser asks, not the site

    You’ll get the camera permission prompt your browser always shows. It belongs to the browser, not to us, which is also where you go to take it back.

  2. Somebody appears

    Usually a couple of seconds, longer when it’s quiet. Nothing counts down and nothing is reserved, because there’s no reservation to make.

  3. You both work out what this is

    With no profile to read off, the opening exchange tends to be whatever is physically around you. Weather, room, the mug. A low bar, and it clears fast.

  4. Somebody skips first

    Either side can, at any point, without saying why. That isn’t rudeness here. It’s simply how calls end.

Honestly, step three is where a good many of them stop. Plenty never get past the weather before one of you skips. That’s the trade for having no filters at all: you get whoever is around, not whoever would have gone down well.

The parts that do the work

Both lenses, or neither

Nobody gets to sit behind a dark square and look at somebody who can’t look back. The even split does more for conduct here than any rule does.

No profile to load

Nothing has to be looked up before a call can start, so the pause you get is the connection and very little else.

One tap to move on

Skipping is a single tap and needs no reason attached. The other person has exactly the same tap, which is the point.

Runs where you are

Whichever browser you’re reading this in is enough. Phone, laptop, the one at work: same page, nothing installed.

Nobody here has done any homework on you. The catch is that you haven’t done any on them either, and some evenings it shows.

Set against the usual way of filling ten minutes

Say it’s a slow afternoon and you’d quite like to talk to somebody. The realistic alternative is messaging a person you already know. Four differences are worth having in mind before you pick one.

  A random call Messaging someone you know
What either side knows Nothing, both ways, start to finish Years of context, split unevenly
Getting in No sign-up of any kind Already signed in to something that knows you
Time before it starts Seconds, most of the evening However long they take to look
Where it runs This tab, nowhere else An app, and usually a second one

Neither column wins. They’re different tools, and only one of them has no entry requirements.

Conduct, and what moderation can and can’t reach

A level start cuts both ways. If nobody can put a name to you, nobody can put one to the person being unpleasant either. Flagging somebody sends it to a human being who can act at the connection level, which works — but it works after the fact. The rest is ordinary care, and there isn’t much of it.

So that’s the mechanism, whole. One tab, two people who have no way to check up on each other, and a skip button either of them can press. Whether a slow afternoon is improved by anonymous video chat is a matter of taste, and the age check above settles that quicker than any more reading will.